Those that are opposed of drug testing recipients believe that denying benefits to drug users punishes families and takes money away from the kids. Applicants are not forced to seek these benefits nor is it just a given right to receive them.
If a soldier does not want to be drug tested, he or she can refuse and just be removed from the military. It will take time but there is strong faith in the idea of keeping the tax dollars where they belong and out of the hands of drug abusers looking for a free ride.
Drug testing welfare recipients needs to be Essays on drug testing welfare recipients action for all states, because taxpayer money should not condone illegal drug use. It is that simple.
Children do not lose benefits if parents test positive, but credits for their needs would be redirected to grandparents, or other appointed adults Hearin, Those who do not use illegal drugs will not have to worry about their benefits being taken away. There are two kinds of people on welfare: Not to mention the consideration of a Essays on drug testing welfare recipients like this has the Fourth Amendment to consider as well.
As far as the idea of this law being unconstitutional, these benefits are not a right they are a privilege. The purpose of the bill has been said to help better recipients and for employment purposes. How to cite this page Choose cite format: With so many different angles and arguments underlying the main issue, it is not something that can be solved in a short amount of time, but rather, needs to be worked and looked at over years to find one or more possible solutions to such a pressing and important issue.
Potential applicants who use illegal drugs simply chose not to enter the welfare system. Taxpayers should provide support to those in need, recipients in return should engage in responsible behavior for receiving assistance. They argue that since some people have jobs where they are never drug tested that poor people should not have to undergo testing either.
Mandatory drug screening for welfare is becoming a large trend across the United States. For instance, highway clean crews could be formed.
The question of whether or not to drug test recipients then brings up a big question, among many others. This establishes a precedent that in order to receive money from an employer or from the government, that they have the right to test the potential employee and beneficent.
It is unlikely that the majority of the welfare beneficiaries are percent disabled. The idea is simple; no taxpayer wants to see their hard earned money to pay for someone on welfare to pay for drugs.
These individuals should lose full or partial custody of their children if they cannot properly provide the necessary care for them.
Almost all applications for any level of job require that an applicant at least be willing to submit a drug test if not actually required to take one. If an individual is not on drugs then it should not be a big deal, just take the test and move on.
They could be produced here, government made and this would also create more jobs. The goal would be to keep the state from being an enabler by giving cash to people who are using. Welfare is essentially a civil service job where people do not actually have to do anything to get paid. The only place that it could be considered part of the constitution that might be affected is the fourth amendment.
No one is labeling anyone. Over the course of one year, this would save the United States of America nine million dollars.
When individuals can be randomly drug tested at school or work, why is it a problem to test people that are living off of the people getting drug tested in order to work? Drug testing those recipients could very easily just be the tip of the iceberg for what lies ahead for the welfare state.
Individuals have to get a drug test to be hired for a civil service job. Instead we should get abusers back on track and prepare to get them jobs and get off assistance.
As mentioned, this is all a very hypothetical situation because drug testing recipients is such a new concept and no one can predict what direction this legislation could end up taking.
While there are those that consider it a fair and an obvious decision, there are also those who view it as unethical, unnecessary and a waste of money. A few believe that it is purely discrimination against the poor, who most often receive these benefits.
Circumstances would dictate the amount of time on a case by case basis. Requiring welfare recipients to stop using illegal drugs is an element of a return obligation.
Many of the states considering this have different plans to go about it, but all would have the same general idea.In November the state of Michigan became the first state in the United States to execute a program of random drug testing for welfare recipients. Under this program, people who test positive for drug usage will be required to enter a treatment program in order to receive Family Independence 4/4(3).
ESSAY SAMPLE ON Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients TOPICS SPECIFICALLY FOR YOU Order now If they test positive for illegal drugs, they are denied welfare for one year, until they given the opportunity to take another test (Alvarez, ). Argumentative essay/paper sample on a given topic "should welfare recipients be drug tested topic" Should welfare recipients be drug tested?
Welfare recipients should not be drug tested due to various reasons. Firstly, testing people to provide to them aid is unconstitutional. Should Welfare Recipients Be Drug Tested (Essay Sample) February. The process of drug testing individuals who are applying or receiving welfare benefits has recently become the focus of a widely spread controversy.
Florida, the first state to pass the law, now requires all individuals applying for public assistance to undergo drug testing. The state of Kentucky. Drug Testing Welfare Recipients: Proposal to Drug Test Welfare Recipients There are approximately 30 million Americans on some sort of welfare right now.
Inthe United States Federal Government spent $ trillion toward mi-centre.com amount spent on welfare in is one of the top expenses, money spent on defense and healthcare were the highest expenses, but welfare was third (Chantrill.
INTRODUCTION: There is an ongoing debate on whether drug testing of welfare recipients is legal in many of the local state governments. Welfare is suppose to meet the basic needs and drugs are far from the basic human needs.Download