The real lesson of new coke

It removes any real difference between you and your competitors. Mix x April 23rd was a quiet day in the Spring ofa nice day; but April 23 became a day that will live, as FDR put it, in infamy —at least from a marketing and public relations point of view.

Then, a survey would be conducted, using individual interviews with a large representative sample of consumers, to verify and quantify the results of the focus groups. In the end, they were just happy to have it over and done with.

New Coke product boycotts. Bythe new formula was marketed as Coca-Cola II and after a while it was taken off the shelves here in the United States it lasted in certain areas around Chicago until When you take your products or your services and make them more like your competition, what does that accomplish?

If it is a long-standing brand, it leads to trouble with your market. Legal action and a potential boycott from the bottlers over syrup pricing and the backlash they faced individually over New Coke.

The focus group results showed that, in this situation, exposure to the views of angry Coke loyalists is likely to sway the others in the group to their position. Some of the highlights of this backlash include: Consumer preference for Coca-Cola was dipping, as was consumer awareness.

The researcher should carry out confirmatory research using a procedure that provides tbe respondent with a level of awareness of tbe views of others comparable to that which is expected to oecur during tbe rollout of the marketing program in question.

However, at some point in the typical group, one physician would express a very negative view to the effect that he or she perceived this new product as nothing more than a repackaging of two existing The Validity of Focus Group Results T his new appreciation of the distinctive capability of the focus group method leads to the following practical advice.

For example, suburban homeowners are likely to be highly and accurately aware of how their neighbors would react to a new line of exterior house paints featuring iridescent colors. The initial reactions of most consumers appeared to be positive. So, Coca-Cola management went ahead with the plan.

On April 23,Coke announced the reformulation with a grand flourish, slaging a multicity satellite press conference in New York, Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, and Toronto.

People seemed to hold any Coca-Cola employee — from security officers at our headquarters building to their neighbors who worked for Coke — personally responsible for the change. Ridicule from talk show hosts and comedians. To compensate for the impact of first impressions, 1, people were shown the Coke statement first and the other 1, saw the Pepsi announcement first.

Lessons from New Coke

Would you try the new drink? One board said Coke had added a new ingredient and it tasted smoother, while another December 2 3 said the same about Pepsi. Note that the difference between the individual and group results in this ease was due to the ability of the focus group to bring to awareness a viewpoint which was probably not even considered during most of the individual interviews.

The Real Lesson of New Coke

The stream of angry letters and phone calls was becoming a flood, and weekly tracking surveys confirmed that consumers were becoming increasingly negative about the change. Two books and at least two marketing cases have been written on the events surrounding the flavor change decision.

That changed, of course, in the summer of as the consumer outcry over "new Coke" was replaced by consumer affection for Coca-Cola The fabled secret formula for Coca-Cola was changed, adopting a formula preferred in taste tests of nearlyconsumers.

On the initial, negative response from consumers:Aunque las interacciones interpersonales en los focus groups no se pueden extrapolar con un % de seguridad a las interacciones que ocurren bajo condiciones.

The Real Lesson of New Coke: The Value of Focus Groups for Predicting the Effects of Social Influence The embarrassing failure of Coca-Cola's attempt to change the flavor of its flagship brand has hecome a textbook case of how mar-ket research can fail.

The lesson usually drawn is that Coke's researchers asked respondents the wrong questions. Coca-Cola classic was sold alongside Coca-Cola ("new Coke"), and the two brands had distinct advertising campaigns, with the youthful, leading edge "Catch the Wave" campaign for the new taste of Coke and the emotional "Red, White and.

In the private taste tests, the new formula was being extremely well received.” On admitting to the New Coke mistake: “Most leaders of American companies begin to get a sense of infallibility and never want to admit a mistake.

The Real Lesson of New Coke: The Value of Focus Groups for Predicting the Effects of Social Influence By Robert M. Schindler n Aprilthe management of Coca-Cola Co. announced its decision to change the flavor of the cotnpany's flagship brand.

View from QSMS at Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. The Real Lesson of New Coke: The Value of Focus Groups for Predicting the Effects of Social Influence The embarrassing failure of.

The real lesson of new coke
Rated 0/5 based on 72 review